My interview in Business Line yesterday. Since this is based on a face-to-face interaction, I have been quoted in brief. I am reproducing the article with some additions to clarify what I mean:
The regulator has made a major disservice by making exchanges ‘for profit’ organisations. — Anand Tandon, CEO, JRG Securities
The Government and capital market regulator SEBI’s
effort to attract retail investment in equities has had little impact.
Retail investors have incurred huge losses in the last few months. Even
as broking firms are trying to woo retail investors with low brokerages,
exclusive research reports and stock recommendations, the wild swing in
the stock market has scared retail investors. The capital market is
dominated by foreign institutional investors and domestic institutions,
and needs a major overhaul to gain investors’ trust, says Anand Tandon,
CEO, JRG Securities, in an interview with Business Line.
Excerpts:
Why are retail investors shying away from market?
It is actually a simple problem, but also extremely
complex. It is simple, because an investor will invest if there is a
chance of making money. If eight out of 10 times he makes money, the
possibility of losing twice is acceptable. On the other hand, if you
loses eight times and make money just twice it is not acceptable, even
if you hit a jackpot twice and cover up all the losses. Essentially,
retail investors have not made money.
What has changed dramatically for small investors in the market?
Intense competition. In fact, the regulator has made a
major disservice by making exchanges ‘for profit’ organisations. The
original function of exchanges was to provide people access to capital.
As opposed to that, today, as a ‘for profit’ organisation, exchanges
provide liquidity pools. In the process, they create their own
transaction charges. With new exchanges coming in, there is no
proportionate increase in liquidity. The liquidity pool is getting divided. So, there is more and more
illiquidity.
What is the impact on market intermediaries?
The competition among exchanges will have a
trickle-down effect on market intermediaries. Some 20 years ago, one had
to shell out Rs 4.5 crore to become a BSE member. Today, you do not
even need Rs 45 lakh. An investment of Rs 4.5 crore would have become Rs
20 crore, even if it was invested in a safe product. But by bring in
more exchanges, you have to pay Rs 10 lakh deposit, and become a trading
member. Essentially, my investment of Rs 4.5 crore 20 years back, is
equivalent to Rs 45 lakh today.The entry barriers are lower, resulting in poorer quality of new members
But competition is good for investors …
It is true to a certain extent. However, If there is such a
plethora of intermediaries in the market, clients will be induced to
trade more. Effectively, the market will become more short-term in
nature. Providing a quality service will become a big challenge. If my
competitor is willing to provide a trading account for free, I will need
to match it. Of course, the compliance cost has gone to the roof.
We have to provide the infrastructure, dealing
terminals, telecom backbone, and watch through every trade and keep
records for eight years. The return I get is decided by the next door
mom-and-shop competitor. I feel we have got into this vicious trap of
over capacity. Consequently, brokerages have gone to the suboptimal
level. There is no incentive for providing advisory services which will
benefit investors.
What is the remedy?
In the interest of banks, the RBI can restrict banks
from competing on certain services offered by them. Public insurance
companies are not allowed to under cut. The Aviation Ministry, which has
no business of regulating tariff, can express its concern to airlines
about under cutting prices. Why does SEBI not monitor the fees charged
by intermediaries, so that service quality is maintained?
Lower charges are beneficial for investors. Isn’t it?
No, not always. Take the case of the power sector. All
the companies have bid the lowest price at which they can supply the
power. Now, they are struggling to fulfil their commitment. Lowering
brokerage charges alone will not bring retail investors back. There was a
time when you could not charge more than 2.5 per cent.Now, even 2.5basis points is difficult to retain. Development of the market cannot be done in the absence of intermediaries.
No comments:
Post a Comment