My column for Wealth Insight Sep edition
The RBI witnessed a change of guard on the 4th of
September with Dr. Rajan taking over as the new Governor. His first statement as
Governor outlined a time bound policy program that enthused markets immensely.
For the average retail investor though, the relevant point of interest was a
mention that a new series of Inflation indexed government securities would now
be issued – which would be linked to the Consumer Price Index (CPI) rather than
WPI (wholesale price index).
This is indeed a big difference. In the past, the government
has attempted to issue inflation indexed bonds (IIBs) several times but not met
with success. Even the issuance earlier this year, while ostensibly a success,
did not excite retail participants. After all, households are interested in
insulating themselves against inflation as they see it – not as the government
would like them to see it. The pedantic argument that WPI is computed more
often than other inflation indices is not likely to cut ice with any investor
who is receiving a return based on a number which is roughly half of what he
actually experiences.
The mechanics of IIBs
In a normal bond, investors take a risk on inflation and
interest rates. For example, investors have no incentive to buy a government
security yielding say 8% today, with CPI at 9%. The investor has no incentive
to save. Additionally, if inflation were to rise to say 9.5%, the saver would
be further penalized. This behaviour forces investors to seek higher yields in
real assets – gold and real estate – as we have indeed witnessed over the past
few years.
IIBs offer an investor a “real” return on investment. The
bond is initially issued with a face value of say Rs 100. The coupon rate would
be a “real rate”, say 2%. If the CPI for the quarter is 9% annualized as in the
example above, the interest rate of 2% would be computed on Rs102.25 i.e.
Rs(100+0.25*9%). The face value at the quarter end would now stand at Rs
102.25. In other words, the inflation is factored into the principal, while the
interest is paid on the enhanced principal.
The long term investor does not need to worry about the
direction of inflation – since the position is hedged. Interestingly, it is
possible that if inflation falls below zero (yes, it can), i.e. price levels
start to fall, the bond principal would be adjusted downwards. In theory, it is
possible that the bond may not repay the entire principal on maturity – if negative
inflation persists. However, in India this is unlikely. Additionally, RBI has
structured the bonds in a manner that in the unlikely event of this occurring,
the investor still receives the principal back.
Nirvana or...?
When it is too good to be true, it usually is too good to be
true. Let’s look at cases where the bond may not offer great value to
investors.
In an environment where inflation rates are already high,
and are likely to fall, an investor may be better served buying a fixed maturity
instrument (a la FMP) which offers a high fixed rate. As inflation falls, the
yield on the FMP may turn out to be higher than on the IIB – despite the real
return. IIB’s therefore may make more sense in a rising inflation scenario
especially where the interest rates are unnaturally subdued by government or
RBI action.
Another key dampener is the presence of institutional
investors subscribing to IIB issuances. RBI issued IIBs in Q1 of the current
fiscal where institutional investors were expected to bid for bonds to determine
coupon rate. Many such investors are entities controlled by government. This
automatically skews the bids in a direction that suits government – lower
payouts – the exact opposite of what suits the retail investor. If RBI is
serious about involving retail households and offering them a real protection
against inflation, it needs to be honest about the cost of doing so.
The tax angle
A possible confusion could be taxation on these bonds. RBI
has clarified that IIBs are not tax free. However, it is not clear whether the
increase in principal as a consequence of inflation indexing will be treated as
capital increase or as income in the year.
The assumption is that only coupon will be treated as
income, while the rest goes as capital and is treated as capital gains at the
time of redemption. Since indexation is allowed while computing capital gains,
for the sake of consistency, the tax indexation should be the same as that used
in modifying the principal. In such a case, there should be no tax on
redemption. This is not likely to be the case. The income tax authorities will
likely use their own series for inflation adjustment, which will, in all
probability, be lower than the adjustment factor applied to the bond –
resulting in some capital gains.
Alternately the principal adjustment could be treated as
income in the year of accrual. In either case, IIBs are no less tax efficient
compared to tax on a comparable bond, in the first case, they are significantly
better. Tax efficiency may be higher in the case of a debt mutual fund though –
and this is something that could worry the retail investor. An early
clarification on this would help.
An alternative to
gold
Assuming that there are no attempts to downplay CPI, and investors
trust that they are indeed protected against inflation, CPI indexed IIB’s are
probably the most potent step that the government has taken to reduce Indian
household’s love for gold. Quantitative restrictions or higher tariffs – both
of which have been introduced - have a tendency to push the gold trade
underground. Offering positive real interest to investors will go a long way in
restoring viability of financial savings in the portfolio of Indian savers. Of course,
this calls the bluff of all those who have been advocating lower interest rates
– despite persistent negative real interest rates.
IIBs, if widely traded, offer a precise way to measure
inflation expectation of investors. This, in theory, is supposed to push
governments towards greater fiscal prudence – since the market signal will set
the tune for other forms of government financing as well. If heeded, this would
indeed be a great step. IIBs have the best chance of inducing genuine retail
interest in government securities market. Let’s hope they work.
No comments:
Post a Comment