Paul Krugman's recent article on emerging market inflation continues to blame the regulators of these emerging countries for not penalizing their population by slowing GDP growth. Krugman writes:
The idea that the US needs to cut back its own consumption, and pay down its debts - is not on the table. It is not "keynesian" after all. That this ruinous policy is leading to inflation is completely negated - "core inflation" remains sub 1% according to official estimates. Notwithstanding that "core inflation" eliminates all prices that have a propensity to go up. Shadowstats.com estimates CPI at close to 10%!
This propensity to blame others for protecting themselves against the economic mismanagement unleashed by the USA exists not only in academia, but also in the seeming loony fringe of USA society. I came across this apparent "right wing" website - that seems to see everything that the world does with the "if you are not with us, you are against us" prism that has now become the touchstone of US policy. So the recent "BRIC" meet that concluded with a statement of the need to find an alternate to the US dollar is a conspiracy of Russia and China to undermine the US economy. The same aticle points to another paper: Economic Warfare - risks and responses whose central thesis seems to be that it is Al-queda that is indirectly responsible for the collapse of the US financial system, and high oil prices (thrown in for good measure). Talk of conspiracy theorists!
So what the world economy “wants” to do is have large capital flows from North to South, and, correspondingly, large current account deficits in the emerging world — which would, of course, help the advanced economies recover.
But ... the transmission mechanism by which capital flows get translated into trade balances has to involve a rise in the relative prices of goods and services produced in the emerging nations. The natural and easy way to get that would be via currency appreciation; but governments don’t want to see that happen. So the invisible hand is in effect getting the same result — gradually — by pushing up nominal prices in these countries.In other words, emerging economies should allow higher imports and lower exports (the consequence of a rising exchange rate) thereby reducing their own GDP growth - since this policy would "help advanced economies recover". I wonder if the prescription would be the same if the economist were to be based in Asia rather than Princeton.
The idea that the US needs to cut back its own consumption, and pay down its debts - is not on the table. It is not "keynesian" after all. That this ruinous policy is leading to inflation is completely negated - "core inflation" remains sub 1% according to official estimates. Notwithstanding that "core inflation" eliminates all prices that have a propensity to go up. Shadowstats.com estimates CPI at close to 10%!
This propensity to blame others for protecting themselves against the economic mismanagement unleashed by the USA exists not only in academia, but also in the seeming loony fringe of USA society. I came across this apparent "right wing" website - that seems to see everything that the world does with the "if you are not with us, you are against us" prism that has now become the touchstone of US policy. So the recent "BRIC" meet that concluded with a statement of the need to find an alternate to the US dollar is a conspiracy of Russia and China to undermine the US economy. The same aticle points to another paper: Economic Warfare - risks and responses whose central thesis seems to be that it is Al-queda that is indirectly responsible for the collapse of the US financial system, and high oil prices (thrown in for good measure). Talk of conspiracy theorists!
No comments:
Post a Comment